Allahabad High Court
A227/13855/2026 of ANIL SINGH Vs SUNIL SINGH on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13855 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a suitable order or direction to the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) (FTC), Prayagraj to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13855 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a suitable order or direction to the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) (FTC), Prayagraj to expeditiously decide the Suit no. 470 of 2019 (Anil Singh V. Sunil Singh) within stipulated period/ time a fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
II. Issue a suitable order or direction to the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) (FTC), Prayagraj to expeditiously decide the 6C application filed in Suit no. 470 of 2019 (Anil Singh V. Sunil Singh) within a stipulated period/time fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. The first prayer made in the writ petition cannot be granted in view of judgement of Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2024) 6 SCC 267 and Division Bench of this Court rendered in case of Ali Shad Usmani vs. Ali Isteba, 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB).
3. The petitioner may, however, move an application for expeditious disposal of Suit No. 470 of 2019 before the court concerned who will decide the same on the basis of pendency of cases before it and also keeping in mind the dictum of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of High Court Bar Association (supra).
4. As far as second prayer is concerned, the court below is directed to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C filed in Original Suit No. 470 of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddhant Sahai Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Anil Singh .....Petitioner(s) Sunil Singh .....Respondent(s)
2019, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) A227 No. 13855 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad