WRIC/39964/2026 of TEJ PRATAP YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 30 September 2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the Computerized Case No.T201605310203568 of 2007 (Hariram Vs. Sri Ram) under Section 34 of the U.P.Z.A.& L.R. Act, 1950, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the proceeding of the aforesaid case under Section 34 of the Act is pending consideration before the respondent no.2 since the year 2007 and the matter is being lingered on at the behest of the opposite parties.

4. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.2 to decide the pending case, as noticed above, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. October 1, 2026 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Srivastava, Subedar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Arun Kumar,J.) Tej Pratap Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad