Allahabad High Court
A227/13825/2026 of DADAN LAL Vs DEVENDRA YADAV AND 8 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13825 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved which was allowed by trial court. According to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13825 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved which was allowed by trial court. According to petitioner, as defendants have violated the interim injunction, an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC was filed, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Misc. Application No. 487 of 2023 filed by plaintiff-petitioner under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Original Suit No. 480 of 2018, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Dadan Lal .....Petitioner(s) Devendra Yadav And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad