Allahabad High Court
CRLP/26547/2025 of VINEET PANDEY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26547 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners have
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26547 of 2025
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners have questioned the first information report dated 07.11.2025 in Case Crime No. 633 of 2025, under Sections- 69, 89 and 351(3) B.N.S., 2023, Police Station- Gagha, District- Gorakhpur.
3. Office report dated 27.04.2026 & 16.07.2026 records as under: "It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet has been filed. Therefore, in view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."
4. In view of the fact that charge sheet in the case has already been submitted by the police after collecting evidence at its level finding petitioners' involvement in the offence complained of, in our considered view it would be appropriate that the charge sheet so filed is questioned in an appropriate proceeding at appropriate forum.
5. Accordingly, we decline to grant any further indulgence in the matter.
6. However, we may clarify that in the event charge sheet is not submitted in the court initially granted temporary protection from arrest in this petition would continue to operate till the submission of charge sheet by the police in the court of competent jurisdiction. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Purushottam Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vijay Kumar, Vivek Tripathi Vineet Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Petition is, accordingly, consigned to records with aforesaid observations and directions. October 1, 2026 A.K.Srivastava CRLP No. 26547 of 2025 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad