Allahabad High Court
WRIC/40399/2026 of ASHISH KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40399 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the impugned order dated
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40399 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the impugned order dated 15.09.2026 passed by the respondent no. 3 under Section 26-Ka (4) of U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
(ii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS restraining the respondent authorities not to take any coercive against the applicant/petitioner."
2. The petitioner aggrieved by the demolition order dated 15.09.2026 has approached this Court.
3. Sri A.P. Paul, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 and 3, states that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of filing a Revision under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
4. We do find substance in the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents no. 2 and 3.
5. Under such circumstances, we direct that if the petitioner files a Revision under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, within two weeks from today then the same shall be entertained and shall be decided within the next three months.
6. For a period of three months or till the decision is taken, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken. October 1, 2026 M.S. Ansari Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anand Prakash Paul, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Ashish Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad