Allahabad High Court

WRIA/16114/2026 of RAM KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16114 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 16114 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to pass appropriate order on the reply submitted by the petitioner on 03.04.2025 and 21.04.2026 for cancellation of the Charge Sheet dated 19.03.2025."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner submitted his reply on 03.04.2025 & 21.04.2026 for cancellation of the charge sheet dated 19.03.2025 but the proceedings are pending consideration.

4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no. 1 to decide the proceedings within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kushmondeya Shahi, Tanuj Shahi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 1 to consider and decide the aforementioned proceedings after considering the reply submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment.

October 1, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16114 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead