Allahabad High Court

WRIA/16043/2026 of VARSHA GARG Vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16043 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard Shri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 16043 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Shri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i) to issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.05.2026 (Annexure-1) passed by respondent No.2.

ii) to issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by the order impugned the petitioner has been transferred to Kannauj just after ten months of service from district Hapur and the petitioner is seeking quashing of the aforesaid transfer order. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration.

4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent authority to decide the representation/application of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra, Avneesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Varsha Garg .....Petitioner(s) The Chief Secretary, Government Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 1, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16043 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead