Allahabad High Court
A227/13808/2026 of RAJINDER PAL SINGH Vs NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13808 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i) direct the court of learned Additional District Judge-First, Kanpur Dehat to decide the Arbitration Case
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13808 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i) direct the court of learned Additional District Judge-First, Kanpur Dehat to decide the Arbitration Case No.4 of 2022 (NHAI Vs. Rajinder Pal Singh and others) pending since 06.08.2022 within a stipulated/fixed period of time as directed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed which is pending before Additional District Judge-First, Kanpur Dehat, registered as Arbitration Case No.4 of 2022. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. Section 34(6) of the Act of 1996 provides for the period for deciding the application filed under the Act.
4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Arbitration Case No.4 of 2022 (NHAI Vs. Rajinder Pal Singh and others), complying the provisions of Section 34(6) of the Act of 1996, after hearing all the affected parties.
5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dinesh Kumar Singh (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Rajinder Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) National Highway Authority Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad