Allahabad High Court

WRIB/4420/2026 of RAJENDRA CHAUHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4420 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon respondent no.2 to decide the delay

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - B No. - 4420 of 2026

Court No. - 51

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon respondent no.2 to decide the delay condonation application filed in Revision No. 2228 of 2026, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that a belated revision was filed by the petitioner challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner passed in proceedings under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The said revision was filed in May, 2026. However, till date, no date has been fixed nor any notices have been issued on the application for condonation of delay. It is prayed that a suitable direction be issued to the respondent no.2 to hear and pass necessary orders on the application for condonation of delay within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

4. In view of the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.2 to fix a date in the aforesaid revision for consideration of the application for condonation of delay, within a period of one month from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order and ensure that the delay condonation application is heard and disposed of within a further period of three months, thereafter. October 1, 2026 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayank Krishna Singh Chandel, Vinod Kumar Chandel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Rajendra Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead