Allahabad High Court

A227/13879/2026 of RAZA ZAKI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13879 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, Order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Principal Judge Family Court,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13879 of 2026

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, Order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Principal Judge Family Court, Allahabad to decide the marriage petition no. 694 of 2025 (Raza Zaki vs Alisha Haider) for 'Rukshati' of O.P. no.2, pending in the court of Principal judge (Family Court), Allahabad, within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble court."

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was married to respondent no. 2 according to Muslim rites and customs in the year 2020. A matrimonial dispute has arisen which led them living separately. A petition for restitution of conjugal rights has been filed which has been registered as Marriage Petition No. 694 of 2025 and the same is pending consideration before Principal Judge, Family Court, Allahabad. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.

3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Marriage Petition No. 694 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshu Pradhan, Jitendra Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Raza Zaki .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)

5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) A227 No. 13879 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead