Allahabad High Court
WPIL/2136/2026 of ANUJ YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 30 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2136 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi learned counsel has accepted notice for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2136 of 2026
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi learned counsel has accepted notice for the respondent no. 4 Gaon Sabha.
2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief:- "(A)
Issue
a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Up-Ziladhikari Sadar Jaunpur and Tehsildar Tehsil Sadar Jaunpur to remove the unauthorized encroachment of Respondent no. 5 and 6 over the Plot no. 1065 area 0.061 Hec. old number is 312/0.061 Hec. recorded as Jalmagan Bhumi/Nali Khata in revenue record 1430-1435 Fasli situated in Village Godhana, Gaon Sabha Godhana, Block Sirkoni Tahsil Sadar District Jaunpur and further the respondent no. 2 and 3 may be directed to take the measurement of the Plot no 1065 area 0.061 Hec, recorded as Jalmagan Bhumi/Nali Khata in Revenue record aforesaid by instituting a committee and clear the area of the Jalmagan Bhumi/Nali Khata and remove everything which found in the area of the plot of the Jalmagan Bhumi in question within period as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."
3. In pursuance of the direction of this Court, the instruction dated 29.9.2026, sent by the Tehsildar, Sadar, District Jaunpur, has been placed before the Court by learned Standing Counsel, which is taken on record.
4. Perusal of the aforesaid instruction shows that when the revenue team Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Sarwar Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Anuj Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
visited the spot for demarcation of plot in question the petitioner was not in the village and he had gone to Mumbai. In presence of the family members of the petitioner the plot no. 1065 was demarcated and stones were fixed. No encroachment was found over the plot in question.
5. In view of the aforesaid report and instructions sent by the Tehsildar, it is evident that plot no. 1065 is free from encroachment, as such, the grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is not substantiated by any material evidence on record.
6. The writ petition is accordingly consigned to records. October 1, 2026 Ranjeet Sahu WPIL No. 2136 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad