Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters order dated 09.09.2025 CGIT- 2 Delhi on 9 September 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Restoration application D-2/25/2024 M/s Seasons Textiles vs. APFC, Noida.
Present: Sh. Harbans Manav, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-09.09.2025 File is taken up for consideration of an application filed for restoration of appeal which was dismissed by this tribunal on 30.04.2022 considering the continuous absence of the appellant. Appellant counsel submitted that his previous counsel had not informed the appellant rather she had misinformed the date as 06.05.2025. He further submitted that after being engaged in this matter he came to inspect the case file on 11.08.2025, then he came to know about the dismissal of the appeal. Respondent has not filed the reply to this application filed for restoration of appeal. However, she submitted that appellant is negligent in pursuing the appeal. He does not care to file the rejoinder despite being given ample opportunities.
I have heard the argument. Though, the ground taken by the appellant is not satisfactory because he has not placed any document regarding the noting down of the date as well as appearance on that particular date by nobody. Yet in the interest of justice this application stands allowed subject to payment of cost Rs.10,000/- out of which, Rs.7000/- is payable to the Registrar CGIT and Rs.3000/- is payable to respondent counsel within a week.
With this, appeal is restored to the original position. Counsel is given three weeks time to file rejoinder. Copy of this order is given to both the parties through email. Put up for 01.10.2025 for filing of rejoinder by the appellant.
D-2/17/2025 M/s Varada Exports vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida.
Present: Sh. Siddharth Jha, Proxy for the Appellant.
Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-09.09.2025
Proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks an adjournment stating the ground of unavailability of the main counsel. Let this matter be listed for 10.09.2025 at 12.00pm.
D-2/15/2025 M/s Om International School vs. APFC/RPFC, Faridabad.
Present: Sh. J.R. Sharma & Sh. Bhupesh Sharma, ld. counsel for the
Appellant.
None for the Respondent. Order dated-09.09.2025 Arguments in the matter heard and concluded. The matter is reserved for pronouncement of order on the misc. application filed for condonation of delay.
D-2/16/2025 M/s Om International School vs. APFC/RPFC, Faridabad.
Present: Sh. J.R. Sharma & Sh. Bhupesh Sharma, ld. counsel for the
Appellant.
None for the Respondent. Order dated-09.09.2025 Arguments in the matter heard and concluded. The matter is reserved for pronouncement of order on the misc. application filed for condonation of delay.
D-2/22/2018 M/s Shivalik Prints vs. APFC, Faridabad.
Present: Sh. J.R. Sharma & Sh. Bhupesh Sharma, Ld. Counsels for the Appellant.
Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-09.09.2025
Written notes of argument filed by the appellant. Copy supplied to the respondent. Put up for final argument on 29.09.2025.
D-2/30/2019 M/s Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vs. RPFC, Noida.
Present: Sh. Yash Sarda, Proxy for the Appellant.
Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-09.09.2025
Respondent submits that in spite of her efforts she is not able to trace the status of Mathura-Vrindavan Development Authority Case. To proceed with the present appeal, RPFC Agra is directed to send the status of the proceeding conducted in respect of the Mathura-Vrindavan Developmet Auhtority case which the appellant has cited during the arguments of the present case, as early as possible within two weeks. Copy of this order be sent to RPFC Agra through email. Put up for 15.10.2025.
D-2/09/2022 M/s Xcelserv Solution Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurguram.
Present: Sh. Yash Sarda, Proxy for the Appellant.
Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-09.09.2025
As the main counsel for the appellant is not available, let this case be fixed for 16.10.2025 for final arguments.
D-2/32/2024 M/s Akasva Infrastructure Pvt. Limited vs. RPFC, Gurugram.
Present: Sh. Yash Sarda, Proxy for the Appellant.
Sh. Vaibhav, Proxy for the Respondent.
Order dated-09.09.2025
Since both the main counsels are not available today, let the case be fixed for final arguments on 27.10.2025.