Allahabad High Court

WRIC/4745/2026 of DEEPAK KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4745 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following prayers. "( a ) issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 4745 of 2026

Court No. - 29

HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.

HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following prayers. "(a) issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent no.2 to decide the Petitioners' Objection dated 08.10.2025 filed before Him (the Respondent no.2) in pursuance of a Public Notice under Section 3G of the Act of the National Highways Act, 1956 (vide Annexure no. 9 to this Writ Petition) in accordance with Law within such period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

(b) issue any other Writ, Order or Direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in order to meet the ends of Justice."

2. Sri Ravindra Kumar Pandey holding brief of Sri Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2, states that objection filed by the petitioner on 8.10.2025 would be decided in accordance with law.

3. Without going further into the merits of the case, we direct that if any objection has been filed and the same has not been decided till date, the same shall be decided within 2 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.

4. The writ petition is disposed of. October 1, 2026 Irshad Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rupendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Deepak Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRSHAD AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead