Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters order dated 08.09.2025 CGIT- 1 Delhi on 8 September 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
Restoration Application in D-1/26/2019 M/s. Multiserve India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC, Delhi (South) Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated- 08.09.2025 The matter is listed today for consideration of an application filed by the appellant under Order IX Rule 4 read with section 151 CPC seeking restoration of the appeal. However, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. In view of the absence of the appellant, the matter is adjourned to 15.09.2025 for the same purpose.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
M.A. no. 31/2023 M/s. SMS Paryavaran Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (North). Present: None for the appellant.
Sh. Mahendra Meena, AR for the Respondent.
Order dated- 08.09.2025 Record perused. The matter is listed today for arguments on the miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay. However, due to the absence of the appellant, it has been adjourned to 18.09.2025 for the same purpose.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/44/2023 M/s. Sumitra International vs. APFC, Delhi (West) Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated- 08.09.2025 The cost of Rs. 5,000/- imposed upon the appellant has reportedly been deposited. However, due to the absence of the appellant, the matter is adjourned to 18.09.2025 for arguments on the misc. application filed under section 7-O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/26/2025 M/s. Prehari Cyber Security and Facilities Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North. Present: Sh. Harshit ,proxy, for the appellant.
Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated- 08.09.2025 The matter is listed today for filing of reply to the main appeal as well as for arguments on the stay application. However, at the joint request of the parties, the matter is adjourned to 18.09.2025 for the same purpose.
D-1/02/2024 M/s Delhi Gymkhana Club Limited Vs. RPFC/APFC, Delhi Central Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. Rahul, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2025 Today the case is listed for reporting compliance of the order dated 02.07.2025 wherein the appellant was directed to deposit 10% assessed amount of Rs.82,08,762/- by way of FDR favouring ‘Registrar CGIT’. , Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed one FDR in compliance of the said order, the same is taken on record.
Reply has already been filed in this appeal. Put up for filing of rejoinder on 16.10.2025. In the meanwhile, stay granted by this Tribunal is continued till finalization of this appeal.
D-1/03/2024 M/s Green Land Telecom Services Private Limited. Vs. RPFC/APFC, North.
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. S. N. Mahanta alongwith Sh. Mahendra Kumar Meena, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2025
Office has reported that appellant has not made compliance of the order dated 26.05.2025 passed by this tribunal. Record perused. On 26.05.2025, this tribunal while disposing an application u/s 7-O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 had directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Fifteen Lakhs only) within six weeks of passing of this order. However, instead of making compliance of order dated 26.05.2025, appellant has sought another six weeks’ time for depositing the same.
Considering his difficulty, another six weeks’ time was granted to comply the above said order. However, the order has still not been complied by the appellant, rather appellant has chosen to remain absent. Since, compliance of order is pre-condition for entertaining the appeal and the appellant has failed to comply with the order, the appeal under section 7-A cannot be entertained. Consequent thereto, appeal stands dismissed. Interim order passed in between stands vacated. Respondent is at liberty to recover the amount assessed. A copy of this order is sent to the parties. Consign the record of this appeal to the record room as per rules.
D-1/64/2019 M/s N & N Chopra Consultants (P) Ltd. Vs. APFC, Delhi South.
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. Prateek Tyagi, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2025 Record perused. This matter had been adjourned en-block since 22.09.2022 and has not come on board since then.
In these circumstances, let this matter be listed for argument on 27.11.2025. In the meantime, let appellant be informed through email.
D-1/70/2019 M/s Prabhatam Infrastructure Limited Vs. RPFC, Delhi North.
Present: Sh. H.D. Sharma and Sh. S.K. Khanna, A/R for the Appellant.
Ms. Santwana Aggarwal and Sh. Mahender Meena, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2025
Let the matter be listed tomorrow i.e. 09.09.2025 for the same purpose. Let it be placed on top of the board.
D-1/72/2019 M/s SPML Infra Ltd. Vs. RPFC-I, Delhi East.
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Surender, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-08.09.2025 Record perused. This matter had been adjourned en-block for several dates and has not come on board since then.
In these circumstances, let this matter be listed for argument on 27.11.2025. In the meantime, let appellant be informed through email.