Allahabad High Court
BAIL/34863/2026 of RAVI NISHAD Vs STATE OF U.P. on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34863 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ishtiyaq Khan, learned counsel holding brief for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34863 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Ishtiyaq Khan, learned counsel holding brief for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Ravi Nishad to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 711 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of BNS and Section 66 (C), 66(D) of I.T. Act, P.S.- Gulriha, District- Gorakhpur, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 27.08.2026 lodged by the informant Shubham Nishad with the allegation that the accused applicant was instrumental in getting his account opened in the bank for the purpose of cyber fraud though he was intimated that the account is open just to get money for some employment related schemes of the government. It is the contention of learned counsel that the accused applicant has no criminal history. There is nothing on record to show the complicity of accused applicant in the offence of cyber fraud. The co- accused Vinay Sahani and Alok Sahani, who were attributed the same role, have been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 18.09.2026 and 21.09.2026, respectively. There is nothing incriminating material against the accused applicant. Investigation is continuing and applicant is co-operating in the investigation. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 27.08.2026. He seeks enlargement of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naveen Kumar Yadav, Raj Pratap Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Nishad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
accused on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State opposed the bail application.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering the role of accused applicant and prima facie no incriminating material is on record against the accused applicant, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 30, 2026 Sharad/- BAIL No. 34863 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad