Allahabad High Court
WRIA/6465/2026 of RAJMANI Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6465 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 15.11.2023 to 15.12.2023 has not been paid by the respondent authorities as well as he is seeking
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6465 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 15.11.2023 to 15.12.2023 has not been paid by the respondent authorities as well as he is seeking benefits of third A.C.P.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that petitioner may file a representation for redressal of his grievances before respondent authorities.
3. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of one week, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent authority in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks thereafter.
4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 Kumar Manish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Munna Yadav, Rajesh Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rajmani .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad