Allahabad High Court
A227/13660/2026 of SMT. SAROJ SRIVASTAVA AND 2 OTHERS Vs SMT. VANDANA SRIVASTAVA AND 3 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13660 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. Issue an order direct the learned court of Civil Judge (S.D.) F.T.C., Court No.13, Prayagraj to decide
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13660 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. Issue an order direct the learned court of Civil Judge (S.D.) F.T.C., Court No.13, Prayagraj to decide the Impleadmant application dated 22.11.2014 and application under section 340 of the Cr.P.C. dated 02.07.2015 filed in Suit No. 1173 of 2013 (Vandana Srivastava Versus Pramod Kumar Srivastava) pending before him as expeditiously as possible by way of day to day hearing within stipulated period."
2. This is a petition on behalf of third party. An impleadment application under Order I Rule 10 CPC has been filed in suit filed by plaintiff- respondent, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the impleadment application dated 22.11.2014 filed in Suit No. 1173 of 2013, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 30, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Laxami Pati, Pavan Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Saroj Srivastava And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Vandana Srivastava And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad