Allahabad High Court

BAIL/18151/2026 of VIJAY RAM Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18151 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Mohd. Monis, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Kumar Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18151 of 2026

Court No. - 66

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mohd. Monis, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Kumar Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.77 of 2026, under Sections 65 (1) of BNS and Section 5 (N)/6 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Sukhpura, District- Ballia.

3. In pursuance of the order dated 15.09.2026, I.O. of this case is present before the Court and accepted this fact that he did not record the statement of brother of victim. Though this fact shows negligence on the part of I.O. but he has apprised that after coming to know about the incident, entire family members bent upon to save the present applicant for that reason he has not recorded the statement of brother, who was also trying to save the applicant. Therefore, no further order is required to pass against the concerned I.O.

4. Brother of the victim Mithun is also present in Court and submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated as he used to object the victim from going out from home.

5. Learned AGA has also submitted that trial of this case has been concluded and the applicant has been convicted for life imprisonment, therefore, the present bail applicant has become infructuous.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted this fact that the applicant has been convicted by the trial court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhijeet Singh, Hari Om Gupta, Mohd. Monis Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vijay Ram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

7. Therefore, the present bail application is dismissed as infructuous. September 30, 2026 A.Kr. BAIL No. 18151 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead