Allahabad High Court

WRIC/38350/2026 of ASHOK GIRI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38350 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Malviya, Advocate states that he has only been authorized to receive notice whereas, Ms. Neha Tripahti, panel lawyer has received notice. 2. The authority

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 38350 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Malviya, Advocate states that he has only been authorized to receive notice whereas, Ms. Neha Tripahti, panel lawyer has received notice.

2. The authority letter issued by the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Ghazipur dated 28.07.2026 is placed before us.

3. Upon the perusal of the authority letter, we find that Sri Awadhesh Kumar Malviya, Advocate has only been authorized to take notice on behalf of the parties. Ms. Neha Tripathi, Advocate present in Court, is directed to hand over the notice to Sri Awadhesh Kumar Malviya, Advocate.

4. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Awadhesh Kumar Malviya, learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad, Ghazipur and learned Standing Counsel.

5. By means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following reliefs: "A Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus and to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the claim of Mutation of house no. 67 Mohlla- Rajaganj and the name of petitioner is register in the record of Nagar Palika Parishad Ghazipur, within a specific time in accordance with law."

6. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neha Tripathi Ashok Giri .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

respondents.

7. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in case if petitioner's claim of Mutation of house no.67 Mohalla, Rajaganj, Nagar Palika Parishad, Ghazipur is directed to be decided by the concerned competent respondent in a time bound period and in accordance with law.

8. In view of the above this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2, Nagar Palika Parishad, Ghazipur through its Chairman to look into and consider the grievance raised by the petitioner in his representation and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months of production of certified copy of this order.

9. Needless to add that the order to be passed shall be reasoned and speaking one. September 30, 2026 S.A. WRIC No. 38350 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead