Allahabad High Court
A227/13720/2026 of SMT. KASTORI DEVI Vs SMT. RAJNI AND ANOTHER on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13720 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is plaintiff's petition. 2. In the suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved which was rejected against which a misc. civil
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13720 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is plaintiff's petition.
2. In the suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved which was rejected against which a misc. civil appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC was filed, which is pending consideration. In the said appeal, an application 5-C for stay has been filed, which is also pending consideration. The sole prayer is for expeditious disposal of application 5-C along with appeal.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the application 5-C filed in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 76 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three weeks, from the date of production of certified copy of this order and, thereafter, proceed with Misc. Civil Appeal No. 76 of 2025 and decide the same, within next two months.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 30, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saumitra Anand Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Kastori Devi .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Rajni And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad