Allahabad High Court
WRIC/36049/2026 of VISHAL SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36049 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Pursuant to the order dated 23.09.2026 passed by this Court, Sri Vishal Singh, petitioner is present before the Court in person. He is duly identified by his counsel namely Ms.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 36049 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Pursuant to the order dated 23.09.2026 passed by this Court, Sri Vishal Singh, petitioner is present before the Court in person. He is duly identified by his counsel namely Ms. Akashi Agrawal, Advocate.
2. It is stated in paragraph Nos.12 and 14 of the writ petition that despite the orders of RERA authority, the respondent no. 4 has yet not released any amount nor is intended to transfer the possession of the flat in favor of the petitioner and since the petitioner has deposited the money but till date possession of the flat has not been given to the petitioner. Paragraph Nos.12 & 14 of the writ petition reads as follows:-
12. That despite the orders of RERA authority, the respondent no. 4 has yet not released any amount nor is intended to transfer the possession of the flat in favor of the petitioner.
14. That the petitioner is going through a tough time since we have deposited hard earned money and has not even opting to be possession of the flat.
3. It is stated by the petitioner at the Bar before the Court that he took the possession of the flat on 09.10.2023 and the sale deed was also executed in his favour.
4. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that wrong and incorrect avements have been made by the petitioner in the petition in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akashi Agrawal, Vidit Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohd. Afzal Vishal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
order mislead the Court, therefore, we are of the opinion that instant petition not only be dismissed with exemplary costs but contempt proceedings may have also drawn against the petitioner parallelly for which question to be framed against the petitioner.
5. At this stage, Sri Vishal Singh, petitioner as well as Ms. Akashi Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner made a request to the Court to take lenient view and prays to dismiss the present petition as withdraw.
6. Taking a lenient view, the writ petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.10,000/- and no contempt proceedings be drawn against the petitioner.
7. The aforesaid cost will be deposited by the petitioner within two weeks from today in the High Court Legal Services Committee, Allahabad and place the receipt before the District Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar within three weeks failing which the District Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar will recover the aforesaid amount/cost from the petitioner as land revenue.
8. Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate a copy of this order to District Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar forthwith. September 30, 2026 saqlain WRIC No. 36049 of 2026 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad