Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15956/2026 of BANDNA AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15956 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: " a writ,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 15956 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "a writ, order or direction of a suitable nature commanding the respondent to finalize the final pension payable to the petitioners on account of death Gyandhar Prasad on 13.09.2022 within a perio period to 57/2026 be specified by this Hon'ble court and to disburse the same, regularly, every month including outstanding arrears of family pension from 14.09.2022, till date within a period to be specified by this Hon'ble court along with interest at such penal rate as may be specified by this Hon'ble court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that after the death of husband of petitioner no. 1 and father of petitioner nos. 2, 3 & 4, terminal benefits as well as family pension has not been paid to the petitioners. The petitioners have already represented the matter and respondent authorities are seized with the matter.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation/application of the petitioners within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Khare, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Bandna And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioners, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 30, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 15956 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad