Allahabad High Court
A227/13746/2026 of SMT. KALAWATI Vs H.K.S. DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. AND 11 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13746 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is defendant's petition. 2. In the suit filed by plaintiffs-respondents, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved in which an ad interim injunction has
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13746 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is defendant's petition.
2. In the suit filed by plaintiffs-respondents, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved in which an ad interim injunction has been granted against which the defendant-petitioner has filed her objection, which is pending consideration. The defendant has also filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the suit, which is also pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the objection along with application filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to proceed with application for grant of temporary injunction filed in Original Suit No. 83 of 2019 and decide the same, in accordance with law, considering the objection/stay vacation filed by petitioner, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order and, thereafter, proceed with application filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and decide the same, within next two months.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 30, 2026//(V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikay Agarwal, Poorva Agarwal, Punit Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Kalawati .....Petitioner(s) H.K.S. Developers Pvt. Ltd. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad