Allahabad High Court
A227/13704/2026 of JAMEER Vs SMT RAHILA AND 2 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13704 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is defendant's petition. 2. Plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit seeking relief of permanent injunction against defendant-petitioner from interfering in their peaceful
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13704 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is defendant's petition.
2. Plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit seeking relief of permanent injunction against defendant-petitioner from interfering in their peaceful possession over the property shown in the plaint. In the said suit, an application for grant of temporary injunction 6-C was moved in which an ad interim injunction was granted on 13.05.2026. The petitioner has filed a misc. civil appeal against the said order which has been dismissed.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to proceed with temporary injunction application 6-C filed in Original Suit No. 378 of 2026 and decide the same, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. In case, any application/objection has been filed by defendant-petitioner, the same shall also be considered while deciding the said application.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 30, 2026//(V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Singh, Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Jameer .....Petitioner(s) Smt Rahila And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad