BAIL/34784/2026 of JITENDRA @ SHERU AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. on 29 September 2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 29 of 2026, under Sections 305(a), 331(3), 317(2), 112 BNS, Police Station- Shahabganj, District- Chandauli, during pendency of the trial in the court concerned.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. The present FIR has been lodged against the unknown person regarding the theft committed in the rented house of the informant. It is next submitted that applicants are having no concern with the allegations levelled against them and they have not committed any offence as alleged by prosecution. It is next submitted that nothing incriminating material relating to the present case has been recovered from the possession of the applicants. Criminal history of the applicants have been explained in the instant bail application and they is languishing in jail since 8.7.2026. Co-accused Prince and Manuu Yadav have been granted bail by this Bench vide orders dated 21.08.2026 & 03.09.2026 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 29682 of 2026 and 31126 of 2026. It is also submitted that the applicants undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Maya Shankar Yadav, Ramkripal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jitendra @ Sheru And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

conclusion of trial.

4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicants.

5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.

6. Let the applicants- Jitendra @ Sheru, Vikash Yadav @ Jhagdu and Vikas Yadav @ Barfi, involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

(i) . The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

(ii) . The applicants will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

(iii) . The applicants will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

(iv) . The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

(v) . The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. September 30, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 34784 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad