Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters orders dated 25.08.2025 CGIT-2 Delhi on 25 August 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
D-2/41/2022 M/s Sterling Mobikes Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurgaon.
Present: None for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
Order dated-25.08.2025 Order in this matter could not be pronounced. The date of pronouncement shall be notified in due course.
D-2/06/2025 M/s Origo Commodities India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram East
2. Present: Sh. Prashant, proxy for the Appellant.
Sh. Naresh Kumar, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-25.08.2025 Proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks adjournment stating that rejoinder has not been prepared today. In the interest of justice, adjournment is granted. Put up the case on 10.09.2025 for filing of rejoinder.
D-2/18/2025 M/s Ahresty India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram West. Present: Ms. Muskan Kaushik, proxy for the Appellant. Sh. Chakradhar Panda & Sh. Lalit Kumar, A/R for the Respondent. Order dated-25.08.2025 This is a fresh appeal which is filed against the order passed u/s 14B of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 by respondent department whereby an amount of Rs.23,90,487/- is assessed as damages for the belated payment of dues. The proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the main counsel Sh. Vivek Kaushal, is not available because his father has expired today in the morning. Ld. Counsel for the respondent submits that he will file the tracking report to establish the fact that impugned order was communicated to the appellant much prior to the date which he has averred in the application. Record perused. An application for condonation of delay has been filed by the appellant mentioning that he has come to know about the order only on 24.07.2025 on receipt of the demand notice issued by the recovery officer. Thereafter, the appellant submitted an application for getting the copy of the order and a photocopy of the impugned order dated 13.01.2025 was provided to him on the same day i.e. 24.07.2025. Thereafter, he has filed this present appeal on 14.08.2025 which is within the period of limitation. Sh. Lalit Kumar, EO present on behalf of the department has informed that no recovery action since 15.07.2025 has been initiated after the issuance of the notice of demand. Let the matter be listed on 16.09.2025 for hearing on the misc. application filed condonation of delay. In the meanwhile, respondent is restrained from taking any coercive action till the next date of hearing. A copy of this order be sent to both the parties through email.
D-2/14/2018 M/s UPSRTC vs. RPFC, Noida.
Present: Sh. Shadab Khan, counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Santwana Agarwal & Sh. Avneesh Kr. Meena, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-25.08.2025 Written submission on behalf of both the parties are filed on record. List the matter on 22.09.2025 for consideration.
D-2/06/2021 M/s UPSRTC vs. RPFC, Noida.
Present: Sh. Shadab Khan, counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Santwana Agarwal & Sh. Avneesh Kr. Meena, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-25.08.2025 Written submission on behalf of both the parties are filed on record. List the matter on 22.09.2025 for consideration.