Allahabad High Court
BAIL/34855/2026 of RAVI DIWAKAR Vs STATE OF U.P. on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34855 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 303 of 2026 under Sections -326(g)/351(3)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34855 of 2026
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 303 of 2026 under Sections -326(g)/351(3) BNS Police Station Kalyanpur District -Kanpur Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further there is some previous enmity between the parties. This a no injury case. It is also submitted that applicant is having no concern with the allegations levelled against him and he has not committed any offence as alleged by prosecution. The applicant is in jail since 11.06.2026. Therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Diwakar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let applicant - Ravi Diwakar be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.
7. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant.
8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 30, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 34855 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad