Allahabad High Court
A227/1679/2016 of ABDUL HAFIZ @ MUNMUN Vs MOHD. SALAUDDIN AND ANOTHER on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1679 of 2016 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner fairly states that his client is not responding in the matter. According to him, execution case might have been decided by
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1679 of 2016
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner fairly states that his client is not responding in the matter. According to him, execution case might have been decided by now.
2. In view of the said fact, writ petition stands dismissed for want of instructions. September 30, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Srivastava, Pushkar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Atul Dayal(Senior Adv.), Rajesh Kumar Dubey (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Abdul Hafiz @ Munmun .....Petitioner(s) Mohd. Salauddin And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad