Allahabad High Court
A227/13734/2026 of ARYA SHIKSHA SABHA AND ANOTHER Vs SHAMBHU SHARAN SRIVASTAVA AND 4 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13734 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution has been filed seeking a direction upon court below to expedite the proceedings of Original Suit No. 1042 of 2022 (Old No.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13734 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution has been filed seeking a direction upon court below to expedite the proceedings of Original Suit No. 1042 of 2022 (Old No. Original Suit No. 328 of 1999).
2. The Division Bench of this Court in case of Ali Shad Usmani vs. Ali Isteba, 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB) had held that no such direction can be issued as it creates a class amongst the litigants but looking to the facts of the case that more than 27 years have elapsed and court below till date has not proceeded to decide the said suit, in view of said fact, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents. The trial court is required to expedite the proceedings of Original Suit No. 1042 of 2022 (Old No. Original Suit No. 328 of 1999) and decide the same, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law on day to day basis, without granting any adjournment to either of the parties.
3. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 30, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Arya Shiksha Sabha And Another .....Petitioner(s) Shambhu Sharan Srivastava And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad