Allahabad High Court

WPIL/2350/2026 of RANVEER SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2350 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, Advocate, has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2350 of 2026

Court No. - 51

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, Advocate, has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents no.2, 3 and 4 to take all preventive measure for protection of the Daragah, Kheda, Charagah Plot no. 1282 Area 0.2020 + .0810 +3.3080+3.7280= 7.3190 Hec of village Padham (Mustaphabad) Tehsil Jasrana District Firozabad and also get the trespassers evicted from over then land of the aforesaid Daragah, Kheda Charagah and recover then damage from them for their illegal occupation of the aforesaid Daragah, Kheda Charagah."

3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amaruddin Ansari Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.655 of 2026, decided on 18.03.2026, upholding the Coordinate Bench decision of this Court in the case of Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ

226.

4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niren Kumar Upadhyay, Shiva Kant Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. Ranveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 14 Others .....Respondent(s)

to entertain the instant petition.

5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties, in accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. September 30, 2026 Anil WPIL No. 2350 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead