Allahabad High Court
BAIL/6500/2026 of MOHD MANSHAD Vs STATE OF U.P. on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6500 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajendra Prakash Shukla, learned counsel holding brief for the accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 1A. None appeared for the other side. 2. The present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6500 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Rajendra Prakash Shukla, learned counsel holding brief for the accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 1A. None appeared for the other side.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Mohd. Manshad to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 1482 of 2009, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S.- Nai Mandi, District- Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the matter is of the year 2009 lodged by the Bank Manager with the allegation that the accused persons had taken loan on the property which was already mortgaged. It is the contention of learned counsel that loan of Rs. 4.5 Lakhs was taken. The accused/applicant was already enlarged on bail but could not appear before the trial court, as such, processes have been issued after submission of charge sheet. The accused/applicant has been arrested on the basis of processes issued by the trial court and since 14.09.2025 the accused/applicant is in jail. The trial is still at nascent stage. Further submits that the propery which was already auctioned by the Bank. The applicant has criminal history of one case, wherein he is in jail. He seeks to be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishabh Shukla, Yogendra Nath Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shiv Sagar Singh, G.A. Mohd Manshad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering the role of accused/applicant of taking loan from the Bank on the property which was already mortgaged and the matter pertains to jumping of bail, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 30, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 6500 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad