Allahabad High Court
WRIC/39540/2026 of SMT AMLA DEVI Vs PRESIDING OFFICER/MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AND 5 OTHERS on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39540 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard Ram Shiromani Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon the Prescribed Authority/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Moradabad to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 39540 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ram Shiromani Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon the Prescribed Authority/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Moradabad to release the amount deposited in fixed deposit scheme in pursuance of the compromised order passed by the Prescribed Authority/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Moradabad vide order dated 13.12.2025 in MAC No. 506 of 2024.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter was compromised between the petitioner and the insurance company in Lok Adalat on 13.12.2025 whereby a sum of Rs. 8,00,000/- was agreed to be paid to the petitioner as compensation. The Prescribed Authority/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Moradabad on 13.12.2025 accepting the compromise had directed that out of Rs. 5,00,000/, Rs. 3,00,000/- was to be released in favour of petitioner while Rs. 2,00,000/- was to be invested in fixed deposit scheme in a nationalized bank.
4. It is contended that in case of Smt. Runna Vs. Vth Additional District Judge/ Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gorakhpur
(1) T.A.C.450 (All.)] it has been held that in case the claimants are major, there is no justification for investing the amount in the FDR.
5. In view of the above, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Prescribed Authority/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Shiromani Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Smt Amla Devi .....Petitioner(s) Presiding Officer/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
Moradabad to release the FDR amount as above along with interest which has accrued thereon in favour of the petitioner forthwith from the production of a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of the High Court.
6. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall act accordingly without waiting for submission of the certified copy of this order. September 30, 2026 A. V. Singh WRIC No. 39540 of 2026
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad