Allahabad High Court

WRIA/15915/2026 of DHIRENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15915 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to pay the due amount of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 15915 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to pay the due amount of leave encashment, group insurance and interest on gratuity for the period between January 2025 to 16.04.2026.

ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to ensure the payment of rupees 68,472 as medical claim of the petitioner. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner and also decide the representation dated 10.07.2026 and 24.08.2026."

2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioner has already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law.

3. In view of these facts, concerned respondent is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 10.07.2026 and 24.08.2026 of the petitioner in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shankar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dhirendra Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIA No. 15915 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead