Allahabad High Court

WRIC/39130/2026 of VINOD KUMAR PANDEY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39130 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Pursuant to order dated 28.09.2026, Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent - Electricity Department placed before this Court a letter dated 28.09.2026

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 39130 of 2026

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Pursuant to order dated 28.09.2026, Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent - Electricity Department placed before this Court a letter dated 28.09.2026 written by the Executive Engineer to the Additional Sessions Judge (VI), Mirzapur, in which it is stated that since no theft was found against the petitioner at the relevant point of time, prayer has been made to dispose of the criminal case.

2. It is argued that the next date fixed in the matter before the court below is 06.10.2026.

3. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the relief, as sought for, has already been granted and no further orders are required to be passed and the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. The writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous.

5. It is important to note that since a letter has already been submitted by the Executive Engineer before the court below, it is expected that the Court concerned will consider the communication/application submitted by the Executive Engineer on 28.09.2026 and decide the case on the next date fixed and in case, it is not possible on the said date, the same will be decided positively within two weeks thereafter. September 30, 2026/gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Badal Khan, Mohd. Shahanshah Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sushil Kumar Pandey (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Vinod Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead