Allahabad High Court
BAIL/33963/2026 of RAKAM SINGH @ RUKMESH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 29 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33963 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33963 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Rakam Singh @ Rukmesh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 83 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 115(2), 109(1), 126(2), 3(5) of BNS, P.S.- Baleni, District- Bagpat during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that the accused applicant has been implicated in this case during the investigation carried out in FIR dated 4.7.2026 lodged by Saurabh Yadav against anonymous persons with the allegation that on 3.7.2026 he was returning along with his wife after UPTET Examination in his car when he blew horn for side, the car at front halted and persons started abusing and also opened fire. It is further contended that there is no specific role attributed on the accused applicant, who was shown as one of the accused on the place of incident and there is no overt act attributed on him. Its a no injury case. The charge sheet has been submitted. The applicant has six cases criminal history, wherein, two case, final report has been submitted and in four cases, he is on bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 7.8.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, Ram Babu Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rakam Singh @ Rukmesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering the role of the accused applicant and its a no injury case, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 30, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 33963 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad