Allahabad High Court

WRIC/39366/2026 of MRS ABHA CHAUDHARY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39366 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, learned

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 39366 of 2026

Court No. - 29

HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.

HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Ajay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.

2. The instant writ petition has been preferred inter alia for the following relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 decide the application dated 11.05.2026 expeditiously within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to execute and register the Sale deed/Sub-Lease Deed in favour of the Petitioner for Plot No. B-247, measuring 299 sq. yards, Sector Omega-II, NRI City, Greater Noida."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for a direction to the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner dated 11.05.2026 within the stipulated period. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Apex Court dated 16.12.2025 passed in Civil Appeal No.11052 of 2025; Ram Kishore Arora Vs. Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.

4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending consideration.

5. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of with an observation that the application moved by the petitioner dated 11.05.2026 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. Mrs Abha Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. September 29, 2026 vijay krishna WRIC No. 39366 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead