Allahabad High Court
BAIL/26680/2026 of AALIM ALI Vs STATE OF U.P. on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26680 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26680 of 2026
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 0057 of 2025, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Jeanpur District Azamgarh, during pendency of the trial.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that no amount whatsoever has been credited as honorarium. It is further submitted that initially, the F.I.R. was lodged under Section 409 I.P.C. also, however, after investigation Section 409 I.P.C. has been dropped. It is submitted that the applicant has criminal history of the three case, which has been duly explained in the bail application as well as supplementary affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 08.07.2026. Therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aalim Ali .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let applicant -Aalim Ali be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.
7. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant.
8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 29, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 26680 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad