Allahabad High Court

WRIC/29165/2026 of RAJPATI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29165 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following relief: "I. Issue a

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 29165 of 2026

Court No. - 37

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing / commanding the respondent No. 2 (Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur) to decide the restoration application case no 726/2026 , Computerized Case No T202614360400726 (Rajpati Vs Kedarnath) under Section 209(J) )of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, filed in case no 11117/2025 computerized case no T202514360411117 (Ishardev Vs State of U.P) under section 24 of U.P Revenue Code 2006 within span of time as may be granted by this Hon'ble Court."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the restoration application filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 17.07.2025 is pending before the respondent no.2 since 15.11.2025. He prays that the said restoration application may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection in the event this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the pending suit, in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.3/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajpati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)

Jaunpur to decide the pending restoration application within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. September 29, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 29165 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead