Allahabad High Court

CRLP/13188/2025 of SMT MISLA DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13188 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13188 of 2025

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 07.06.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 397 of 2025, Under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 191(2), 61(1)(a) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Kotwali, District Mainpuri (Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition).

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents not to arrest the Petitioner in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 07.06.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 397 of 2025, Under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 115(2), 352. 351(2), 191(2), 61(1)(a) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Kotwali. District Kotwali."

2. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the Court, however, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State is present.

3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded on 03.08.2025 before the court concerned.

4. Heard Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.

5. Taking into consideration the non-appearance of learned counsel Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manvendra Singh, Rishabh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Salilendu Kumar Upadhyay Smt Misla Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

for the petitioner, submission advanced by A.G.A. for the State and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, nothing is left for further adjudication in the instant writ petition.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 29, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 13188 of 2025 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead