Allahabad High Court
BAIL/27444/2025 of SUSHIL MAURYA Vs STATE OF U.P. on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27444 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sukhvir Singh, learned counsel for the accused-applicant, Sri Mohit Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27444 of 2025
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Sukhvir Singh, learned counsel for the accused-applicant, Sri Mohit Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Sushil Maurya to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 170 of 2024, under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 506, 120-B IPC, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Jaunpur, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been implicated in the F.I.R. by the informant with the allegation that he has taken money for providing a job to the son of informant. Further contended that huge money has been transferred for getting a job. Neither the job was assured nor the money was returned. Further contended that the applicant has three cases criminal history, in which, in one case, he is on bail and in two cases, he is in jail. The charge sheet is submitted. The trial is still at the nascent stage. The applicant is in jail since 19.03.2025 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Nirbhay, Gyan Singh, Pramod Kumar Maurya, Ram Soorat, Sukhvir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohit Kumar Tiwari, Prem Narain Sushil Maurya .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered the allegation of getting government job for money.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 29, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 27444 of 2025 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad