Allahabad High Court
BAIL/28727/2026 of SAJJAN SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28727 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Sandhya Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28727 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Sandhya Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Sajan Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 161 of 2026, under Sections 331(4), 305(A), 317(2), 317(4) BNS, P.S.- Ajeetmal, District- Auraiya, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the F.I.R. has been lodged against the anonymous persons on 01.06.2026 for the incident of 18.05.2026, with the allegation that there was a theft in the house of informant, wherein cash and jewellery has been stolen. Further contended that the name of the accused-applicant has been figured out when the police has arrested the accused-applicant in another case and on the basis of disclosure statement, the accused-applicant has been implicated in this case. Further contended that the recovery of some cash at the instance of the accused-applicant and other accused. The applicant has 27 cases criminal history and all the cases have been levelled by the police against the accused-applicant pertaining to theft. He is on bail in 24 cases, but he could procure the bail orders of 21 cases, as in three cases, the bail orders are not available and in remaining three cases, the accused- applicant is in jail. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant is in jail since 19.06.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandhya Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sajjan Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered that the name of accused-applicant has been reflected on the basis of disclosure statement.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 29, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 28727 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad