Allahabad High Court
WRIC/29178/2026 of GEETA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29178 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "1. issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 29178 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "1. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.2, Tahsildar Bansgaon, Tahsil Bansgaon, District Gorakhpur to decide the mutation case no.2075 of 2025 as well as Computerized Case No.T202505310102075, under section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Geeta Singh Vs. Dheeraj Singh and others) relating to Mauja -Majgawa, Tappa Mahsin, Pargana- Unwal, Tahsil Bansgaon, District Gorakhpur, within stipulated time as fix by this Hon'ble Court;"
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that mutation was allowed by the judgement and decree dated 14.10.2019 on the basis of a compromise entered into between the parties, without impleading the petitioner. In view thereof the petitioner filed restoration application which was allowed by the court concerned on 13.05.2026. However, after being restored, the mutation proceeding has not been decided by the respondent no.2. He prays that the said suit may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection in the event this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the pending case, in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shruti Shrinet, Utpal Srivastav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Geeta Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2/Tehsildar, Bansgaon, Tehsil Bansgaon, District Gorakhpur to decide the pending mutation proceedings within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing of both the parties. September 29, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 29178 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad