Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters orders dated 13.08.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi except item no. 2 & 3 of the cause list which are uploaded separately on 13 August 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
22(4)2011 M/s Hotel De-Romana vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Mahendra Meena, A/R for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025
Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted his written notes of arguments. Oral arguments in the matter had already been completed and the A/R for the respondent was directed to file the trial court record. However, the A/R has submitted that the trial court record is not traceable. Accordingly, the matter is reserved for pronouncement of final order.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/18/2024
M/s. JSR Enterprises vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.
Present: Sh. Manish Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent no. 1.
Sh. Kapil Arora, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent no. 2.
,
Order dated- 13.08.2025
Arguments on the misc. application filed u/s 7O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 heard and concluded. The matter is reserved for pronouncement of order on the same.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/14/2025
M/s. T R Sawhney Motors Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.
Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025
Today, the case is listed for filing of reply to the appeal by ld. counsel for the respondent, however, more time is prayed by the A/R present on behalf of the respondent. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed as a last chance. Put up on 25.09.2025 for filing of reply to the appeal by respondent.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/30/2023 M/s SAR Engineers Vs. APFC Delhi East.
Present: Sh. Sandhesh Jha, for the Appellant.
Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025
Today, the case is listed for filing of reply to the appeal by ld. counsel for the respondent, however, more time is prayed by the A/R present on behalf of the respondent. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed as a last chance. Put up on 25.09.2025 for filing of reply to the appeal by respondent.
D-1/10/2024 M/s Parasvnath Developers vs. APFC, Delhi Central.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, ld. counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. Rahul Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel, for the respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025
Today, the case is listed for filing of rejoinder by ld. counsel for the appellant, however, more time is prayed by the ld. counsel present on behalf of the appellant. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed as a last chance. Put up on 29.09.2025 for filing of rejoinder by appellant’s counsel.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, DELHI D-1/13/2024 M/s K.R.F. Limited vs. APFC, Delhi West.
Present: Sh. Manish Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
Ms. Suwaleha Siddiqui, proxy Counsel (For Sh. Sandeep Vishnu) for
the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025
Proxy Counsel appearing for the respondent seeks more time to file reply to the misc. application filed for seeking stay as well as to the main appeal. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed as a last chance. Put up on 30.09.2025. In the meanwhile, interim order, if any, to continue till next date of hearing.
D-1/58/2024
M/s Dolphin Mart Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, ld. counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel and Sh. Sunil Ranjan,
A/R for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025 Ld. Counsel for the respondent has already filed the reply to this appeal. The copy of appellant is also placed in the file which is handed over to ld. Counsel for the appellant today 29.09.2025 for filing of rejoinder by ld. counsel for the appellant.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI
607(4)2011 M/s National Textile Corp. Ltd. Vs. APFC, Delhi.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. Satpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025
Final arguments in the matter heard in part. Issue in the present appeal is in regard to the applicability of Sec 12 of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 where the provision is that the employer shall not reduce the wages of its employees. However, issue pertains to the fact whether the appellant is liable to pay the contribution at the rate of 10% or 12% in respect of the employees of the sick industry declared by BIFR and later on taken by new holding company which is paying contribution to its original employees at the rate of 12%. Put up the case on 16.09.2025.
774(4)2013
M/s Divas Laboratories Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi Present: None for the Appellant.
Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025 Record perused. For the last several occasions matter has not come up on board and it has been adjourned en-block by the predecessor of this tribunal. Let the case be listed for final arguments on 01.10.2025. A notice is to be issued to the appellant through email.
200(4)2016
M/s Chelsea Mills vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. Kunal Surhatia (Vakalatnama filed on behalf of Ms. Swati
Surhatia, Ld. Counsel) for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025 Record perused. For the last several occasions matter has not come up on board and it has been adjourned en-block by the predecessor of this tribunal. Let the case be listed for final arguments on 01.10.2025. A notice is to be issued to the appellant through email.
649(4)2016
M/s Trisatar Global Infrastructure Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (South)
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. Rajesh Kumar & Sh. Yash Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the
Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025 Record perused. For the last several occasions matter has not come up on board and it has been adjourned en-block by the predecessor of this tribunal. Let the case be listed for final arguments on 01.10.2025. A notice is to be issued to the appellant through email.
117(4)2017
M/s Shishu Sansar vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (east)
Present: Sh. Akhil Bansal, ld. counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. Rajesh Kumar & Sh. Yash Narayan, Ld. Counsel & Sh.
Sunil Ranjan for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025 Final arguments in the matter heard in part. Ld. counsel for the respondent is directed to produce the trial court record on the next date of hearing. Put up on 16.09.2025 for further arguments.
117(4)2017
M/s NMS Enterprises Limited vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (east)
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. Sunil Ranjan for the Respondent.
Order Dated-13.08.2025 As arguing counsels for both the parties are not present, put up the matter on 18.09.2025 for final arguments. Meanwhile, office is directed to issue notice informing the next date of hearing to ld. counsel for the appellant.