Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22218/2026 of RAJNISH KUMAR @ TIPU RAM (MINOR) Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22218 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22218 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 14.08.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 192 of 2026, Under Sections 137(2), 87 of B.N.S., Police Station Sikandarpur, District Ballia. (Annexed as annexure No. 1 to the writ petition).
(ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the concerned Respondent not to arrest the Petitioner no. 2 in pursuance to the First Information Report dated 14.08.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 192 of 2026, Under Sections 137(2), 87 of B.N.S., Police Station Sikandarpur, District Ballia.
(iii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the concerned Respondent authority to register the first information report of the petitioner in pursuance of the application dated 03.09 2026."
2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded to the court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Kumar, Virendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anuj Kumar Gupta, G.A. Rajnish Kumar @ Tipu Ram (Minor) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
concerned on 19.09.2026.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A., with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, as advised.
4. Heard Mr. Narendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Vijay Rathi, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 29, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22218 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad