Allahabad High Court
WRIC/27761/2026 of DEO NARAYAN AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27761 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "( a ). Issue
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 27761 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent No. 2 i.e. Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue Dehsil Naugarh District Chandauli to decide the Case No 1383 of 2025 Computerized Case No. D202514180001383 filed on dated 19.08.2025 Under Section 198(4) of Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Katwaru and others Versus 17 Mahaveer and others) as possible as with in short stipulated period which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed a case before the respondent no.2 being Case No. 1383 of 2025, under Section 198(4) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, which is pending since 19.08.2025. He prays that the said case may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection in the event this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the pending case, in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harish Chandra, Pramod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Deo Narayan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s)
the respondent no.2/Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue Tehsil Naugarh, District Chandauli to decide the pending case within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. September 29, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 27761 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad