Allahabad High Court

WRIC/36745/2026 of SHILPI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36745 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "( a ). Issue

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 36745 of 2026

Court No. - 37

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no.2 (Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Handia, District Prayagraj to decide the Case No. 21440 of 2025, Computer Case No. T202502040421440 dated 17.11.2025, Shilpi Vs. Om Prakash Upadhyay and others, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before him, expeditiously or within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a Suit No. 21440 of 2025, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before the respondent no.2 Sub-Divisional Magistrate Handia, District Prayagraj since 17.11.2025. He prays that the said suit may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection in the event this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the pending suit, in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2/Sub-Divisional Magistrate Handia, District Prayagraj to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Shankar Singh, Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Shilpi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s)

decide the pending suit, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. September 29, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 36745 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead