Allahabad High Court
WRIC/35511/2026 of PEETAM @ PREETAM SINGH AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35511 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(i). Issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35511 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Additional Collector (Finance and Revenue), Shamli-respondent no.3 to decide the Case No. RST/115/2026 (Computerised Case No. D202609720000115) Naseem & others Vs. State of U.P. , under Section 128 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible preferrably within the short span of time as granted by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent no.2 vide order dated 18.11.2025, the matter had been remanded to the respondent no.3 with a direction that the case be decided afresh within a period of three months. It is further submitted that the Case No. RST115 of 2026, under Section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has not been decided for almost one year. He prays that the said case may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection in the event this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.3 to decide the pending suit, in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Peetam @ Preetam Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
the respondent no.3/Additional Collector (Finance & Revenue), Shamli to decide the pending case within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. September 29, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 35511 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad