Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters orders dated 11.08.2025 CGIT-2 Delhi except Item no. 1 on 11 August 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-2/33/2024 M/s Huawei Telecommunications (India) Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC, Gurugram.
Present: Sh. Ankit Gurav, proxy for the Appellant.
Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order Dated-11.08.2025
At the outset, counsel for the respondent has submitted that the High Court of Delhi while hearing the writ petition filed on behalf of the appellant, in its order dated 12.07.2023, has observed that order passed under section 14B of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred as the Act) is subject to the outcome of the writ petition, and therefore, he has made prayer that this appeal file be consigned to the record room sine-die awaiting the order of High Court in the pending writ petition.
Record perused. The writ petition bearing W.P. (C) 2640/2017 has been filed by the appellant against the issuance of the notice u/s 14B of the Act as well as scheme launched by the Ministry of Labour and Employment in the year 2017. It is further informed by the counsel that the next date of hearing before Delhi High court is 25.09.2025.
Considering the fact that the matter is still pending before this tribunal and has not come on board for the last one year due to pendency of writ petition before Delhi High Court, it is ordered that the appeal be consigned to the record room sine-die. Both parties are at liberty to revive the same after disposal of the writ petition.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-2/36/2024.
M/s Rathi Steel & Power Ltd. vs. APFC, Meerut.
Present: Sh. Kumar Vikram, for the appellant.
Sh. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order Dated-11.08.2025
Ld. Counsel for the respondent has filed a reply to the application filed on behalf of the appellant for taking on record the balance sheet. Copy of the reply stands supplied to ld. counsel for the appellant and the same is taken on record. Put up on 12.09.2025 for final arguments.
Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)