Allahabad High Court
BAIL/34656/2026 of SAVITRI Vs STATE OF U.P. on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34656 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Mayank Mohan Dutt Mishra, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34656 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Mayank Mohan Dutt Mishra, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Savitri to enlarge her on bail in Case Crime No. 101 of 2026, under Sections 87, 137(2), 142, 61(2) BNS, P.S.- Sahjanwa, District- Gorakhpur, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the F.I.R. has been lodged by the father of victim on 22.02.2026 for enticement against the anonymous person. Subsequently, during the investigation, the name of applicant has been reflected, wherein it is found that the brother of accused, namely, Shivanshu has enticed the daughter of informant. It is merely because of social media, photographs, which was recovered from the mobile phone of the accused-applicant that she has been made an accused in this matter. She has no knowledge of whereabouts of the accused and the abductee, although there is specific mention in the case diary that both of them have entered into marriage. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 20.06.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Mohan Dutt Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Savitri .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered the complicity of the accused-applicant and her defence that she is not aware about her brother and victim.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 29, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 34656 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad