Allahabad High Court
WRIC/1166/2026 of SHANKAR DIGVIJAY NISHAD AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1166 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. 2. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 1166 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that certain area of their land which did not belong to the respondent nos. 7 and 8, had been sold out by them under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to the respondent no.
6.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since, their portion of land had been sold out by the respondent no. 7 and 8, this Court may direct the concerned Collector to decide the claim of the petitioners.
4. We have heard the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and we are of the view that if the petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that respondent nos. 7 and 8 have sold out the share of land which did not belong to them, the petitioners have every right to pursue the remedy which lies under the Civil Laws. As such, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. September 29, 2026/Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ishan Deo Giri, Vivek Mishra (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Shankar Digvijay Nishad And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad